Equine Law Matter - Closed - Get Information, Read Court Documents

LISA WILLIAMSON Plaintiff/Appellant v. LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF MARK C. CURRAN, JR., ET AL. Defendants/Appellees.

 No. 09-CV-562

 

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF.

NOW COMES LISA WILLIAMSON, APPELLANT, by and through her attorney HERMAN J. MARINO, who hereby submits her FIRST Request for Enlargement of Time to File her Reply Brief:
1. On January 24, 2012, Appellant filed her Brief, with paper copies submitted February 1, 2012.
2. On February 23, 2012, Appellee Curran timely filed its Response Brief.
3. Appellant’s Reply Brief is due March 8, 2012.
4. Appellant is scheduled to be out of town during the week of February 27, 2012, and will not return until Monday, March 5, 2012. Upon his return he has an arbitration scheduled for Wednesday, March 7, 2012 in Kane County Illinois and a deposition scheduled Thursday, March 8, 2012.
5. Filed herewith is the Affidavit of Appellant’s counsel summarizing the reason why he is requesting an additional ten (10) days to file the Reply Brief, through Monday, March 19, 2012.

6. Appellant has filed this Motion seven days in advance as required under Circuit Rule 26.
7. A copy of this motion was served upon counsel for Appellee by facsimile transmission before filing.
8. Appellant has two prior request for enlargement of time for filing its initial Brief and NO request for enlargement of time to file its Reply Brief.
9. Appellant’s counsel believes that no party will be prejudiced by granting Appellant additional time to file her Reply Brief, since oral argument has not been scheduled.

WHEREFORE, APPELLANT LISA WILLIAMSON, by and through her attorney HERMAN J. MARINO, respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant her an additional ten (10) days through and including Monday, March 19, 2012 to file her brief; and provide such further and other relief as is just in the premises.

Respectfully submitted,
LISA WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff
s/ Herman J. Marino
by: One of her attorneys

 

Listen to Attorneys’ Arguments before Court       

View Decision   


 

No. 09-CV-562

 

First Amended Complaint 

Plaintiff Exhibit 1

Plaintiff Exhibit 2

Plaintiff Exhibit 3 

Plaintiff Exhibit 4 

Plaintiff Exhibit 5

Plaintiff Exhibit 6

Plaintiff Exhibit 7 

Plaintiff Exhibit 8 

Plaintiff Exhibit 9

Lake County Sheriff Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Diver Grach Motion to Dismiss

Christine Capuson Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Sheriff Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Diver Grach Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Response to Christine Capuson’s Motion to Dismiss 

Lake County Sheriff Defendants’ Reply in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss

Diver Grach Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 

Christine Capuson Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 

Opinion and Order