SCROLL for update | Judgment entered against Holly Stanley of Bayridge Show Stables (NY) for $34,509.07




Dutchess County

Index No. 50989/18



The defendant is in default in this action. A judgment of default was granted by decision
and order of September 5, 2018, in which this inquest was scheduled. The plaintiff, Jennifer
Wheeler Winborne, testified as follows: She is from Springtown, Texas. She breeds, raises and
trains “hunter ponies”. On or about September 1, 2011, for $5,000.00, she purchased a stallion pony
called Gayfield’s Way Too Cool (“Cool”). He produced “very trainable kid-friendly ponies.”

In or about February 2016 Plaintiff leased Cool to Defendant for one year, which was then
extended for a second year. Defendant testified that she leased Cool from the plaintiff in order to
start a breeding program for offer to the public. After the two years of leasing Cool expired,
Plaintiff “wanted him home”. In or about March of 2018 she asked for his health papers so she
could get Cool transported to her farm in Texas on a horse trailer. Plaintiff then learned that Cool
was unwell. She found a veterinarian at Rhinebeck Equine, LLP and on or about March 16, 2018
she had Cool brought there for examination, care, and medical treatment. However, on or about
April 3, 2018 Cool had to be euthanized.

Per Exhibit 2 in evidence, the plaintiff incurred $9,109.07 in total expenses for Cool’s care
and treatment at Rhinebeck Equine, LLP. Pursuant to Exhibit 3 in evidence, Plaintiff incurred
$2,500.00 for Cool’s cremation at Connecticut Horse Cremation, LLC in Killingsworth, Connecticut.

The parties’ contract in evidence as Plaintiffs Exhibit 8 provided as follows: Cool’s value
was $5,000.00. He was being leased by Plaintiff to Defendant for breeding purposes for the term
February 15, 2016, through August 1, 2016. There was no monetary fee for the lease. Instead,
Defendant was entitled to five breedings per season with no stud fee charge. The defendant was to
provide Cool with “suitable breeding facilities, proper feed, sufficient water, medical and veterinary

care as required, in a manner consistent with quality horse care practices industry-wide.” Pursuant
to paragraph 8 of the lease, the defendant was to bear “any and all risks of loss from the death of or
any harm to the Stallion only if any such event is caused by the lessee …” However, since Defendant
defaulted in the action, the question of negligence or fault is not now before this court. At the end
of paragraph 11 of the lease, the defendant indicated she wanted to lease Cool again for 2017
season. Although the court was not provided with a signed copy of the Stallion Lease Agreement
both parties acknowledged that this was their agreement and consented to it being entered into

The plaintiff seeks damages for her expenses for Cool’s veterinary care, for the purchase
price of Cool (Cool’s value), for lost earnings as a result of Cool’s death and for her pain and

Plaintiff claims Defendant breached her contractual obligations to care for Cool and that her
negligent care resulted in his illness and death. The defendant offered testimony to dispute this but
failed to do so by answering the complaint. Defendant has not moved to vacate the default.
Therefore, the issues of liability and any testimony in that regard cannot be considered by the court.
Plaintiff currently has nine of Cool’s offspring, two that she purchased, “Keep It Cool” and
“Be Cool”, which are now nine and fifteen years old respectively. The other seven are five years
old or younger. Plaintiff testified that she also had four more between the ages of five and nine.
She testified that she usually bred two ponies per year from Cool. By way of example of lost
earnings, the plaintiff had admitted into evidence a lease for “Keep It Cool” from December 12, 2016
to December 12, 2017 for $35,000.00. She testified that “Keep it Cool” is now on lease for a year
for $20,000.00.

Plaintiff also testified that because she doesn’t have Cool she has to pay for an outside stud
fee of $1,000 per pony and about $400.00 for each artificial insemination. She claims that Cool
was 21 years old and fertile and speculates that she lost years of leasing Cool’s foals and at least five
years of breeding and that foals are worth $2,500.00 to $5000.00 for weanlings and yearlings,
$5000.00 to $10,000.000 for two to three-year-olds, and $10,000.00 to $25,000.00 for four-year-olds
and up, and more for performance ponies with show records. However, Plaintiff agreed with
the defendant that much of this is speculation because there are no guarantees with breeding, training
or showing.

Plaintiff offered photos as evidence of Cool’s condition when he got to the Defendant’s farm and
in the days leading to the end of his life. She became visibly upset and seeks an award for emotional
pain and suffering.

On cross-examination, the plaintiff acknowledged that it takes two years or more to train a
pony for shows, that she has no actual proof of lost earnings, that she did not stand Cool to the public
for stud fees, and only made money from his ponies that she trained to be show/performance ponies.

Plaintiff testified that the ponies’ value is based upon the ability to promote them, that she raises one
to two per year and shows them “in hand” which means pre-training. She testified that she did not
sell young stock (under three years old) and that she has about five of Cool’s ponies now that are
considered young stock.

Pursuant to the contract, the Defendant was entitled to five breedings per season over the two
seasons during which she leased Cool. The defendant testified that they could not collect semen
from Cool during the first year so there was no money from that in year one. In year two she said
they were only able to use two doses to impregnate outside mares and that this was not sufficient for
her pursuant to the contract. In the first year, she was only able to use Cool as a “live cover stallion”
which means that the mare is brought to the stallion to be impregnated. In year one she got three
foals as a result of live-cover and in year two she got four foals as a result of live cover. Defendant
testified that most people do not want to transport their mares, and instead want the semen shipped
to them.

Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff

Based upon all of the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against the defendant to include her out of-
pocket expenses for the value of Cool, his veterinary care and his cremation in the sums of
$5,000.00, $9,109.07, and $2,500.00, respectively, less the $4,600.00 Plaintiff acknowledged she
raised through contributions for Cool’s care, for a net total of $12,009.07.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim for emotional pain and suffering due to the loss of
companionship of Cool must be denied. New York does not recognize a cause of action for such
pain and suffering nor is an animal’s value as a companion recoverable as damages, but only its

value as personal property. See, for example, Johnson v. Douglas, 187 Misc.2d 509 (Sup.Ct.,
Nassau Cty 2001); Mercurio v. Weber, 2003 WL 21497325 (District Court, Nassau County 2003).

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to $22,500.00 for the average cost of replacement of foals
for a period of two years. Plaintiff testified she had Cool produce two foals per year. Defendant
acknowledged that she was able to have Cool produce three foals the first year and four foals the
second year. The sum awarded reflects a modest production of foals and is based on Plaintiff’s
experience with Cool since 2011 reflecting what Cool would have produced for Plaintiff over a two
year period and what their value would have been during those years. The balance of the fees sought
by Plaintiff, including for producing show ponies and earnings as a result of those, are based purely
on speculation and, as Plaintiff agreed, there are no guarantees of this type.


Accordingly, it is ORDERED

Plaintiff is entitled to a total judgment [against the defendant Holly Stanley / Bayridge Show Stables of 47 Brush Hill Road Millbrook, NY] in the sum of $34,509.07 with interest at the statutory rate from the date of commencement of this action, April 11, 2018, and shall have execution thereon.

The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

October 18, 2018


View the Judgment of $34,509 against Holly Stanley of Bayridge Show Stables

Holly Stanley update 

May 2019


A judge issued an arrest warrant for Holly Stanley after she was a no-show in civil court. 

Stanley surrendered herself to the court on Monday. Although the judge found her in contempt of court, she was given additional time to turn over the documents. If she fails to obey the civil court’s Order, she faces 30 days in jail.

On Tuesday, May 14, 2019, Stanley appeared in criminal court. She allegedly starved the pony stallion Gayfield’s Way Too Cool.


INDEX NO. 2018-50989





Plaintiff (Judgment-Creditor),

Index No. 50989/18

Defendant (Judgment-Debtor).


WHEREAS, Plaintiff has heretofore moved this Court for an order adjudging the defendant
in contempt of court for her willful failure and refusal to submit to a deposition as a judgment-debtor
and to turn over documents or records containing information about her property, income or other
means relevant to the satisfaction of the judgment, as per a duly served subpoena and as required by
this Court’s orders dated March 18, 2019, January 24, 2019, and September 5, 2018, and

WHEREAS, this Court has determined that the refusal of the defendant, to turn over certain
items as required by this Court’s orders and Plaintiffs subpoena was calculated to and did defeat,
impede, impair and prejudice the rights and remedies of the plaintiff herein and constituted a,
contempt of this Court, and

WHEREAS, this Court issued an order dated March 18, 2019, determining that the defendant
is in contempt of this Court and that she could purge the contempt by complying with the said subpoena

and orders by April 26, 2019, failing which a sentencing hearing would be held May 9, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.                                                        and Defendant having failed to purge the contempt and further having failed appear at the
hearing, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant be punished for such contempt by imprisonment in the Dutchess County Jail in the County of Dutchess for a term of thirty days or until she complies with this Court’s order dated March 18, 2019, and Plaintiff s subpoena by turning over the items directed to be turned over to the plaintiff, and, upon release, appearing for a deposition, and

WHEREAS, proof has been made to this Court that a copy of the order with notice of entry
has been served upon the defendant;

NOW, THEREFORE, you are hereby commanded to take the body of Defendant and bring
her before this court when the court is in session (Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.)
to be dealt with according to law.

Dated: May 10, 2019

Poughkeepsie, NY



View Holly Stanley arrest warrant




The criminal case related to pony’s death


New York v Holly Stanley

Holly Stanley Charged with Animal Cruelty in Pony Stallion Death